Is The Most Selfish Species On Other Human Beings

Humanity is known as the most selfish species on this planet. We seem to think that everything serves for our benefit. Truth is, we share this planet with all the other species. They do not serve us nor do they think they are the dominant species. We have killed many species into extinction. Some for fun, some for money and some just because. Animals are very reserved and just like to do their own thing. They mind their business and don’t try to pry into other’s business. Now I’m not saying that exploring is a bad thing. But what I want to get across is that we shouldn’t have to cut open and test these poor creatures that have done nothing but mind their business and keeps the cycle going. We use all kinds of animals to test out everything that we want to use. But why don’t we test it on other human beings for better results? Oh right. Because it’s inhumane. Many animals are born just to be tested on from the get go. Imagine living your whole life getting jabbed on a daily basis with some new formula that can cause deformations to your body, have a severe allergic reaction to, and that might or might not kill you. Imagine not knowing if you’ll still be living the next day. These animals might possibly be thinking all of this and we don’t even know it. Animal testing has been going on since the nineteenth century. It made its way into cosmetics when a woman almost went blind after using her mascara darkener (Murnaghan). Because of this incident, the FDA passed an Act in 1938Show MoreRelated The Selfish Gene Essay914 Words   |  4 PagesThe Selfish Gene We are survival machines—robot vehicles blindly programmed to preserve selfish molecules known as genes. -- Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene (1). Can genes alone determine your DNAs place in the next generation? Are humans simply vessels for these genes? With his provoking work entitled The Selfish Gene, Richard Dawkins attempts to answer such questions as he proposes a shift in the evolutionary paradigm. Working through the metaphor of a selfish gene, DawkinsRead MoreSelfish Relations : An Evolutionary Explanation Of Altruistic Behaviors1528 Words   |  7 PagesIssues in Evolution Paper 3 Selfish Cooperation: an Evolutionary Explanation of â€Å"Altruistic† Behaviors Cooperation among organisms, particularly among humans, is a phenomenon that has avoided being explicitly explained by the anthropological and biological community. Selfish genes are theoretically the genes that should be pervasive among individuals because of the implicated fitness benefits associated with selfish behavior. Yet, cooperation is abundantly found in human behavior cross-culturallyRead MoreThe Origin Of Moral Sense By Charles Darwin1529 Words   |  7 Pagesnatural selection. In his 1871 book, Charles Darwin explains the origin of morality through studying the behavior of various species. In his essay, â€Å"Origin of the Moral Sense† Charles Darwin uses his theory of evolution to explain the origin of morality through the study of animals, specifically mammals. Darwin’s main theory of the â€Å"Origin of the Moral Sense† is that humans have natural social instincts which in turn gives them a sense of naturally occurring morality. Darwin’s ideas surrounding moralityRead MoreWilliam Baxter’s Anthropocentric Justification Regarding Regulation of Pollution1611 Words   |  7 PagesContemporary Moral Problems 3 December 2012 William Baxter’s Anthropocentric Justification Regarding Regulation of Pollution Introduction: William Baxter addresses the issue of pollution, using a human-oriented method by which all value assigned to flora and fauna is dependent on each entity’s benefits to humans. In this essay I will briefly explain Baxter’s anthropocentric approach, attempt to show the flaws in Baxter’s arguments, examine his possible recourse after revisiting these points, and thenRead MoreRousseau s The Social Contract1588 Words   |  7 Pagesand a more personal, individual will. However, Rousseau’s and Marx’s theories of a general will, or collective being have discrepancies in both the origin and implications of general will and individual will. Rousseau defines general will as a collective desire to advance society towards a common goal. However, Rousseau warns that ignoring the general will and pursuing one’s own selfish personal will is dangerous not only for an individual, but can also ultimately lead to the destruction of the bodyRead MoreThe Birth mark Is More Than A Blemish1727 Words   |  7 Pagesphysical world collectively, including plants, animals, the landscape, and other features and products of the earth, as opposed to humans or human creations† (â€Å"Nature†; emphasis added). The primary definition asserts that nature is a separate and opposing entity from mankind. In spite of this, humans have acted with a sense of ownership over nature for centuries, depleting, manipulating and polluting the natural world. This human interaction with nature is depicted in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s short storyRead More100 Heartbeats1395 Words   |  6 Pages 24 III-13 December 5, 2012 100 Heartbeats The Race to Save Earth’s Most Endangered Species Introduction Title: 100 Heartbeats Author: Jeff Corwin Credentials: Jeff Corwin has been working for wildlife conservation from a very young age. He is a wildlife biologist, an Emmy Award-winning producer and host of several television seriesRead MoreWhy Do We Fall in Love?1359 Words   |  6 Pagesof sexuality. Let us examine what is probably the most dominant one: the biological or evolutionary theory which is essentially based on the idea that the survival of the fittest is the primary force in nature and the source of any given creature s particular characteristics, from single cells right up the evolutionary chain to animals and humans. From this perspective, our sexuality derives from the fact that the perpetuation of the species is achieved through a sexual relationship betweenRead MoreAnalysis Of Nick Lanes Life Ascending : The Ten Great Inventions Of Evolution1666 Words   |  7 Pagesto say that his current book being analysed can be viewed as credible. The purpose of this critique is for an in-depth examination of Nick Lane’s views on sexual reproduction. This includes advantages and disadvantages which would provide clarity when compared to asexual reproduction as well as the theories he has stated in the chapter from various other geneticists. His evaluation on sexual reproduction, gathers information from both his own research as well as other geneticists, to provides a pieceRead MoreExplain The Importance Of Utilitarianism And Preservationism1726 Words   |  7 Pagescurrent view towards protection of nature: utilitarianism and preservationism. These terms may sound similar to most people. In fact , when we disclose the meanings behind them, we will see that the ways they treat the environment behind these two doctrines are distinct. From lecture, utilitarian means that â€Å"the value of any part of nature is determined solely by its usefulness to human† (Robbins et al. 70). Meanwhile, preservation states that â€Å"the management of natural resource or environment for