The Catcher In The Rye :: essays research papers

Getaway from reality In 1950 J.D. Salenger catches one of society’s disasters, the breakdown of a young person, when he composed The Catcher In The Rye. Holden Caulfield, a flighty â€Å"man† isn't so much as a man by any means. His superfluous desire to deceive keep away from showdown routs masculinity. Holden has not developed and can't manage the obligation of living on his owe. He whimsically utilizes a hunter’s cap to mask him self from others. Reality of his life is pitiful and before long prompts his being standardized. He attempts to get away from reality with his reactions. Realizing he will never live up to his parents’ desires, his solitary genuine companion is his eight-year-old sister Phoebe, to whom Holden advises that he truly needs to be ‘the catcher in the rye†. Holden concedes his solitary truth and shows that Phoebe is his lone companion. Another type of getaway for Holden is his acting, which he uses to pardon the past. Holden has attempted to l ie, stow away, and accuse his way through life; when he finds that it isn't the appropriate response he crumples. Holden is a neurotic liar. He lies, a few times for reasons unknown. Holden says his name is Rudolf Schmidt, who is intensely the janitor, to Mrs. Morrow on the train. He keeps on lying all through the discussion and abstains from getting together by saying he has a tumor in his cerebrum. This is the kind of falsehoods Holden tells. One purpose behind this may be that he is attempting to shroud his actual personality. He doesn't need individuals to know who he truly is or that he was kicked out of his fourth school. Holden is continually utilizing counterfeit names and takes a stab at talking in a tone to convince somebody to think a moron way. He does this when he converses with ladies. While he is conversing with the specialist he discloses people groups responses to his untruths like they truly trust him, when it is truly conceivable that he is a shocking liar and they are taking a gander at him with a â€Å"what are you talking a bout?† articulation. Holden frequently deceives where he is misleading him self. To Holden ever one is a â€Å"phony†, and each one has an issue that he believes he needs to misuse. While Holden is addressing the specialist, he reprimands every individual as he meets them in his story.

War is Kind vs. Dulce et Decorum Est Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

War is Kind versus Dulce et Decorum Est - Essay Example Plainly, the subject of every piece focuses to the force of enthusiasm which treats war either as something adequate and drained of malice or as an object of hatred. In 'War is Kind', the creator endeavors to offer a grave understanding to the lowliness and generally speaking great the war is given to have. The tone with its smooth surface improves the sonnet's subject to achieve the objective of understanding that, in spite of the unfriendly events and closures, war certainly acts in consideration. No extreme symbolism is rendered, rather the apparently gentle and theoretical straightforwardness of what will undoubtedly happen or be satisfied as in a prediction particularly on referencing â€Å"These men were destined to bore and kick the bucket (Crane)† in two strophic events. Then again, 'Dulce et Decorum Est' contains components and gadget which W. Owen regarded important to place the crowd in the shoe of reality that sets up the fact that it is so horrifying to stand up t o the evil destinies of battle.

Never Happier

Never Happier Money cant buy happiness. Weve all heard this phraseâ€"and similar idioms, platitudes, and clichesâ€"before. Weve heard them ad nauseam. But the thing about platitudes is, well, theyre platitudes for a reason: theyre often true. While its true that money can purchase certain necessary comforts (clothes, food, housing), and these comforts are a key ingredient in ones recipe for a happy life, money alone will never make you happy. Not long term at least. Take it from me and my first-hand authoritative experienceâ€"my empirical evidence, as it were. At age 31, I earn less money than I did at nineteen, but Ive never been happier; Ive also never been a better person than I am right now. My happiness is derived from my experiences, from my relationships, from my healthâ€"not from my income. Minimalism has helped me realize that if I relinquish my need for expendable income, and if I can adjust my lifestyle to revolve around experiences instead of material possessions, then I need far less money to live a happy, fulfilled life. As long as I earn enough money to provide my basic needsâ€"rent, utilities, meals, insurance, savingsâ€"then I can find my happiness in other ways. Related reading: A Minimalists Thoughts on Money.

I Am Global, Resilient, And Empathic - 875 Words

Everybody has their strengths and weaknesses. Strength can be defined in countless ways and the strength of someone is unmeasurable. I believe the strength is the unique elements of a person, which help them overcome a challenge. In other word, without the strength a person can’t overcome the obstacles. Strength is the key to open up a new door in your life; door full of opportunities, which will make people grow and improve. There is an old Japanese saying: â€Å"Juunin Toiro,† which means ten people, ten colors. This is saying everybody is different and unique. This goes the same for the strengths of each person. People have different strengths as they cope with the difficulty differently. My strengths are that I am global, resilient, and empathic. When I face a problem, I think up of a solution in two ways. I would think as an American and I would think as a Japanese. Solving and coping with the hardships with two perspectives has helped me become global and also better problem solver. I moved to U.S. from Japan when I was 8 and I have been immersed to both of the cultures evenly. Thus I have two perspectives towards the world as if I have two minds. Moving away from Japan has given me an opportunity to see the weaknesses of my culture. It has also made me realize that I was living in a small world where everybody thought the same way. On the other hand, by having the Japanese cultural view I realized weaknesses of the American culture. Although America is an enormous countryShow MoreRelatedSuccessful Women Hr in India13762 Words   |  56 Pagesinfrastructure CSR), HDFC Bank Ltd â€Å"Like everyone else, I had the same apprehensions, the same concerns about being accepted, heard and majorly, about work-life balance.† I was all set out to be a â€Å"shrink†Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã‚  Ã‚   †¦and therefore had taken up Psychology Honors in college. One of my aunts was a clinical psychologist and her insights on people and ability to make a difference fascinated me. When I came to Mumbai from Delhi for my post graduation, I learnt about the Personnel Management and Industrial RelationsRead MoreMID TERM STUDY GUIDE Essay16611 Words   |  67 PagesFreud 3. Adults may underestimate children’s ability to: (7) a. Learn b. Problem-solve c. Recognize reality d. All of the above *** 4. Family conditions that promote resilience include: (11) a. few alternative caretakers. b. older mothers for resilient males. c. opportunities to participate*** d. a strong sense of political commitment. 5. According to your text, some of the things that cause our children problems are the following: (www) (7) a. the changing world, values, and crises *** b

Is The Most Selfish Species On Other Human Beings

Humanity is known as the most selfish species on this planet. We seem to think that everything serves for our benefit. Truth is, we share this planet with all the other species. They do not serve us nor do they think they are the dominant species. We have killed many species into extinction. Some for fun, some for money and some just because. Animals are very reserved and just like to do their own thing. They mind their business and don’t try to pry into other’s business. Now I’m not saying that exploring is a bad thing. But what I want to get across is that we shouldn’t have to cut open and test these poor creatures that have done nothing but mind their business and keeps the cycle going. We use all kinds of animals to test out everything that we want to use. But why don’t we test it on other human beings for better results? Oh right. Because it’s inhumane. Many animals are born just to be tested on from the get go. Imagine living your whole life getting jabbed on a daily basis with some new formula that can cause deformations to your body, have a severe allergic reaction to, and that might or might not kill you. Imagine not knowing if you’ll still be living the next day. These animals might possibly be thinking all of this and we don’t even know it. Animal testing has been going on since the nineteenth century. It made its way into cosmetics when a woman almost went blind after using her mascara darkener (Murnaghan). Because of this incident, the FDA passed an Act in 1938Show MoreRelated The Selfish Gene Essay914 Words   |  4 PagesThe Selfish Gene We are survival machines—robot vehicles blindly programmed to preserve selfish molecules known as genes. -- Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene (1). Can genes alone determine your DNAs place in the next generation? Are humans simply vessels for these genes? With his provoking work entitled The Selfish Gene, Richard Dawkins attempts to answer such questions as he proposes a shift in the evolutionary paradigm. Working through the metaphor of a selfish gene, DawkinsRead MoreSelfish Relations : An Evolutionary Explanation Of Altruistic Behaviors1528 Words   |  7 PagesIssues in Evolution Paper 3 Selfish Cooperation: an Evolutionary Explanation of â€Å"Altruistic† Behaviors Cooperation among organisms, particularly among humans, is a phenomenon that has avoided being explicitly explained by the anthropological and biological community. Selfish genes are theoretically the genes that should be pervasive among individuals because of the implicated fitness benefits associated with selfish behavior. Yet, cooperation is abundantly found in human behavior cross-culturallyRead MoreThe Origin Of Moral Sense By Charles Darwin1529 Words   |  7 Pagesnatural selection. In his 1871 book, Charles Darwin explains the origin of morality through studying the behavior of various species. In his essay, â€Å"Origin of the Moral Sense† Charles Darwin uses his theory of evolution to explain the origin of morality through the study of animals, specifically mammals. Darwin’s main theory of the â€Å"Origin of the Moral Sense† is that humans have natural social instincts which in turn gives them a sense of naturally occurring morality. Darwin’s ideas surrounding moralityRead MoreWilliam Baxter’s Anthropocentric Justification Regarding Regulation of Pollution1611 Words   |  7 PagesContemporary Moral Problems 3 December 2012 William Baxter’s Anthropocentric Justification Regarding Regulation of Pollution Introduction: William Baxter addresses the issue of pollution, using a human-oriented method by which all value assigned to flora and fauna is dependent on each entity’s benefits to humans. In this essay I will briefly explain Baxter’s anthropocentric approach, attempt to show the flaws in Baxter’s arguments, examine his possible recourse after revisiting these points, and thenRead MoreRousseau s The Social Contract1588 Words   |  7 Pagesand a more personal, individual will. However, Rousseau’s and Marx’s theories of a general will, or collective being have discrepancies in both the origin and implications of general will and individual will. Rousseau defines general will as a collective desire to advance society towards a common goal. However, Rousseau warns that ignoring the general will and pursuing one’s own selfish personal will is dangerous not only for an individual, but can also ultimately lead to the destruction of the bodyRead MoreThe Birth mark Is More Than A Blemish1727 Words   |  7 Pagesphysical world collectively, including plants, animals, the landscape, and other features and products of the earth, as opposed to humans or human creations† (â€Å"Nature†; emphasis added). The primary definition asserts that nature is a separate and opposing entity from mankind. In spite of this, humans have acted with a sense of ownership over nature for centuries, depleting, manipulating and polluting the natural world. This human interaction with nature is depicted in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s short storyRead More100 Heartbeats1395 Words   |  6 Pages 24 III-13 December 5, 2012 100 Heartbeats The Race to Save Earth’s Most Endangered Species Introduction Title: 100 Heartbeats Author: Jeff Corwin Credentials: Jeff Corwin has been working for wildlife conservation from a very young age. He is a wildlife biologist, an Emmy Award-winning producer and host of several television seriesRead MoreWhy Do We Fall in Love?1359 Words   |  6 Pagesof sexuality. Let us examine what is probably the most dominant one: the biological or evolutionary theory which is essentially based on the idea that the survival of the fittest is the primary force in nature and the source of any given creature s particular characteristics, from single cells right up the evolutionary chain to animals and humans. From this perspective, our sexuality derives from the fact that the perpetuation of the species is achieved through a sexual relationship betweenRead MoreAnalysis Of Nick Lanes Life Ascending : The Ten Great Inventions Of Evolution1666 Words   |  7 Pagesto say that his current book being analysed can be viewed as credible. The purpose of this critique is for an in-depth examination of Nick Lane’s views on sexual reproduction. This includes advantages and disadvantages which would provide clarity when compared to asexual reproduction as well as the theories he has stated in the chapter from various other geneticists. His evaluation on sexual reproduction, gathers information from both his own research as well as other geneticists, to provides a pieceRead MoreExplain The Importance Of Utilitarianism And Preservationism1726 Words   |  7 Pagescurrent view towards protection of nature: utilitarianism and preservationism. These terms may sound similar to most people. In fact , when we disclose the meanings behind them, we will see that the ways they treat the environment behind these two doctrines are distinct. From lecture, utilitarian means that â€Å"the value of any part of nature is determined solely by its usefulness to human† (Robbins et al. 70). Meanwhile, preservation states that â€Å"the management of natural resource or environment for

Does Language Shape Culture Free Essays

Csecsei Luca 12. IB Does language shape culture? Most questions of whether and how language shapes thought start with the simple observation that languages differ from one another. And a lot! Just look at the way people talk, they might say. We will write a custom essay sample on Does Language Shape Culture? or any similar topic only for you Order Now Certainly, speakers of different languages must attend to strikingly different aspects of the world just so they can use their language properly. The word order can be completely different among languages. And also there are tenses in some languages that we do not have, use or do not know what it really means. Such as the subjunctive in spanish language. It is a tense which is the hardest to learn while learning spanish, because such a tense that has so many meanings does not exist nor in hungarian, neither in english. I had the chance to spend a year in the U. K. and i also to take spanish there, i experinced that to learn this tense is just as hard for the english as it was for me when I learned spanish in my previous school, which was a spanish-hungarian bilingual school. Culture is learned, but taught through the language. Language is never the entity which has been invented in isolation. It certainly has evolved gradually with the continuous development of a culture. A culture being a building made of different beliefs in supernatural, social behaviors, human emotions, or way of expressing feelings, the language has continually adapted accordingly to accommodate these identified notion and gesture of human activity. Finding a symbolism every time to register it in the language, thus contributing to its growth. A language has always been a weapon to express one’s ideas and feelings. And the reason enough to make this weapon more efficient to handle one’s need of expressing things with intended accuracy. It has been tuned-up with each new finding, getting honed up continually to get its flawless shape with developing culture. Culture is determined by the language it uses with a great extent. The first thing that comes to my mind is always slang. Language clearly shows where people belong, if someone speaks really mincing his words that shows he is educated nd nor grown up on the streets like most of the people who use slang words and developed a whole new language between them. We are all members of a social group and members of `society? as a whole. People interact in many ways and communication is just about the most common and among the most important. Whatever is meaningful to a group, from their everyday life to their traditions constitutes their very own culture and is ge nerally respected by all group members. Language is only one of such items. For ethnic minority groups that may have a language of their own, their language is a cornerstone in their culture. Take a look at dialects anywhere int he world. It clearly shows different customs, not just in language or communication. There a lots of dialects in South-America, for instance. Spanish in Latinamerica differs a lot from nations to nations, or we can also say, from culture to culture. There are dialects also in our country, Hungary. And people on the north of the country speak in a different way, like pronounce sounds so much different. Use words and expressions that we do not use at all. They also have differently built, constructed and decorated houses, songs, tales and wear different clothes as their costume. Taken together I do think linguistic processes are obtrusive in most fundamental domains of thought, unconsciously shaping us from the nuts and bolts of observation and perception to major life decisions. Language is central to our experience of being human and is central to our beliefs, and the languages we speak profoundly shape our culture. How to cite Does Language Shape Culture?, Essays

Religious Values in War and Peace

Introduction World religions make use of the scripture to justify their actions, which are ultimately deployed in the context of war and peace (Almond 45). It is arguably evident that scriptural passages have been quoted as the guiding principles for the engagement in warfare and the establishment of peace.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on Religious Values in War and Peace specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More This implies that scriptural knowledge is vital when analyzing the religious values on war and peace, especially in societies whereby religion is used as a motivation and justification of war and peace (Daryl 85). This paper bases on comparative religious studies in order to have a comprehensive overview of the justifications for war and peace basing on the religious scriptures. The fundamental argument that forms the basis of the paper is that all religions in the world have within themselves the seeds that can be result to the establishment of either war or peace. It is also vital to take into account the viewpoint that factors that determine peace and war in the world religions are based on the divine commandments, teachings attained from the scriptures and the divine interpretations of the scriptures by the believers (Gopin 100). Basing on the scriptural comparisons of the various world religions, this paper discusses their respective religious views with regard to the elements of war and peace. A consensus among all the world religions in relation to war and peace is the opposition to use of force that is deemed lethal or killing. There are exceptional cases where killing and the use of force is justified, but only under particular circumstances (Hertog 74). A comparative review of the scriptures of the various world religions reveals that there is a fundamental rule against killing although there is a variation relating to the strength of the applicability of the rules. In th e context of Buddhism, every person usually trembles during the times of violence owing to the fact that life is cherished by every individual. According to Dhammapada 10.130, putting oneself in the place of another individual, a person is not required to kill. In addition, an individual is not required to compel another person to kill (Super 145). With regard to Christianity, killing is condemned in the bible. Matthew 5:21-22 clearly states that â€Å"thou shall not kill; and whoever kills will be in danger of judgment†¦Ã¢â‚¬  This clearly indicates the stance of killing with regard to the taking of another person’s life (Irving 147). It is believed that an individual has no authority of taking another person’s life. Hinduism also lays emphasis on the respect for another person’s life as a core requirement for the establishment of peace.Advertising Looking for research paper on religion theology? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper w ith 15% OFF Learn More As outlined in their scripture at Bhagavad Gita 16. 1-3, the supreme personality of Godhead outlines three transcendental individual qualities including fearlessness, having self-control, nonviolence, having a compassion for all living things and being free of anger (Hertog 96). These qualities are needed for the development of divine nature. In addition, their stance against violence is emphasized by the fact that the religion is against the use of attacks, even for those who are deemed most despicable. Furthermore, attacks should not be directed at those who are peace-making (Daryl 78). Islam is also against the taking of human life, which they perceive as made sacred by Allah, except in circumstances that call for just cause. This is stated in the Quran 17:33, and indicates the stance of the Muslims against killing. Jainism is also against the use of violence and people should avoid being involved violence as much as possible (Hertog 102). From its scriptures, Purushyartha Siddhyapaya 60, states that â€Å"having precisely understood the meaning of violence, its outcomes, the victims and the executor, individuals who embrace the values of the religion should restrain from violence, to the best of their capacity. The guiding principles of Judaism are somewhat similar to those held by the Christian faith; the doctrine prohibits individuals from committing murder, as stated in Exodus 20:13 (Gopin 125). It is arguably evident that all the world religions oppose the taking of another person’s life, which has been emphasized using commandments for the Abrahamic religions; moral standards and virtue in the case of Buddhism; and an advocacy for the establishment of peace and non violent activities in the case of Sikhism. Jainism does not have any exceptions and killing is prohibited for all forms of life (Gopin 126). Causes that can give good reason for the use of armed force In cases whereby force is deployed, all the world religions except for Jainism attempt to rationalize the use of armed force for just causes. Jainism emphasizes on the rule of non-killing. The different religions in the world have diverse conditions and scenarios that justify the use of force, with an emphasis on just causes and right motives. In the context of Buddhism, killing is only justified when protecting the Dharma by the kings, lay men and the upasakas as outlined in Mahaparinirvana Sutra, Chapter 5. Hinduism justifies the use of killing basing on the religious duty of fighting (Daryl 100). Armed force is also justified in Buddhism when an individual’s life is threatened, for the case of self- defense and protecting the people.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on Religious Values in War and Peace specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Hinduism prohibits the use of war for the purpose of conquest and a person has the authority of killing an assass in who has shown his/her intents of murder, such an acts results to no guilt, which is justified by their scriptures that state that â€Å" fury recoils upon fury† as outline sin the Manu Smrti 8.348-350. In addition, armed force is justified in cases whereby a person is administering punishment to a person who rightly deserves the punishment, provided that they are under the due process of justice (Hertog 148). Islam justifies the use of armed force when fighting for the cause of Allah, especially for those individuals who are against you. However, limits are not supposed to be transgressed because they are prohibited in Quran 2:190 (Irving 145). Armed force is also justified to ensure that there is prevalence of justice and faith in the context of Allah. Fighting is also justified against the people who do not believe in Allah and for defending one-self. The religion of Jainism does not justify any sort of killing whatsoever. Judaism on the other hand justifies killing for just causes of the Lord, as evident in Numbers 32:20-22. Justification also bases on penalty for taking someone else’s life vests on the life of the killer; that is life for life and an eye for an eye (Almond 147). It is arguably evident that the justifications for the use of armed forces and fighting are many including protecting the religion and righteousness, as the case of Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam and Judaism; protecting the innocents, as in the case of Hinduism and Islam; fighting to end oppression, as in the case of Islam and Sikhism; administering punishment to the performers of evil, which is the case of Christianity and Islam; self defense as in the case for Hinduism and Islam and acquisition of the promised land of God for Judaism. Jainism on the other hand does not justify any form of killing, even for the case defending one-self and protecting other people (Gopin 100). It is also important to note that self-defense is not viewed widely as a religious cause, resul ting to its rejection in some religious scriptures such as the New Testament (Hertog 147). The intent motive behind using force The motive underlying the deployment of force is also an important aspect outlined in the doctrines of the various religions in relation to war and peace (Daryl 47). Even in cases where there is a justification of the cause, the values of most religions emphasize on the view that armed action must be undertaken with the true motives and attitudes. A comparative scriptural analysis reveals that Buddhism and Christianity stress on the importance of love and compassion for the enemies and those individuals who are receiving punishment. In the context of Hinduism, proper motive is determined by the undertaking of one’s duty; this implies that using violence with wrong motives and unjustified killing results to negative consequences on oneself, as outlined in the principle of Karma (Gopin 78).Advertising Looking for research paper on religion theology? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The Islam scriptures outline the consequences of not acting with the right intent, which includes hell for any person who kills a believer purposefully. In the religious values of Islam and other religions such as Judaism, the right intent should aim at the fulfillment of the will of God. Sikhism on the other hand encourages their fighters not take think of their own lives and that self-sacrifice is case of martyrs. Jainism does not justify any intent for the case of killing, and a thought about killing constitutes a sin (Irving 74). With regard to the authority to use force, Buddhism gives the king the power to punish. Christianity on the other hand gives the ruler the power of the sword and considers it as a right that is God ordained. Hinduism authorizes the kings and warriors to use armed forces when in a righteous battle. The Quran on the other hand lays emphasis on the going to war for the cause of Allah; it does not offer authority to specific people to wage war. Such authori ties are allocated to the imams and Muslim leaders (Gopin 78). When deploying force as the last option, Buddhism lays emphasis on the soft approach, Christianity emphasizes on forgiveness, while Islam states that those in the quest for peace shall receive peace while those engaging treason shall be thrown back. Conclusion This paper has discussed the values of various religions towards war and peace. It is arguably evident that engaging in war needs a strong justification and that taking human life is only permitted under specific scenarios for important causes outlined in the doctrines. A general consensus across all the world religions is the opposition towards taking another person’s life. The religious scriptures offer an important indication on the levels to which war and violence are embraced in a particular religion. The limitation is that it is subject to different interpretations, which has resulted to misrepresentation of the religious values relating to war and pea ce. Works Cited Almond, Gabriel. A String Religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003. Daryl, Charles. War, Peace, and Christianity: Questions and Answers from a Just-War Perspective. New York: Crossway publications, 2010. Gopin, Marc. Between Eden and Armageddon: the future of world religions, violence, and peacemaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. Hertog, Katrien. The complex reality of religious peacebuilding: conceptual contributions and critical analysis. New York: Lexington Books, 2010. Irving, Horowitz. The idea of war and peace: the experience of Western civilization. New York: Transaction Publishers, 2007. Super, John. Religion in world history: the persistence of imperial communion. New York: Routledge, 2006. This research paper on Religious Values in War and Peace was written and submitted by user Finnegan Gallegos to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here. Religious Values in War and Peace